[address-policy-wg] [Ext] Re: 2017-01 New Policy Proposal (Publish statistics on Intra-RIR Legacy updates)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ext] Re: 2017-01 New Policy Proposal (Publish statistics on Intra-RIR Legacy updates)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Mon May 1 17:06:48 CEST 2017
Hi Gert, Gert Doering wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 04:20:31PM +0000, Leo Vegoda wrote: > > If there is no gap in the policies and what you are proposing is service, > > why > > was this introduced to the Address Policy WG? The charter for the RIPE NCC > > Services Working Group makes it clear that it is the home for discussions > > about the introduction of new services and tools > > (https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/services). > > The AP and NCC Services WG chairs debated this, and it's "sitting on > the fence" - legacy stuff / NCC services obviously go to the NCC Services > WG, but since it was felt that APWG "owns" the transfer policy document, > which is potentially subject to change here, the proposal ended here. > > We've sent a heads up to the NCC Service WG so they are informed. Thanks for the explanation! Regards, Leo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4988 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20170501/432afc48/attachment.p7s>
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ext] Re: 2017-01 New Policy Proposal (Publish statistics on Intra-RIR Legacy updates)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]