[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Telefon Ip
office at telefonip.org
Sun Oct 23 16:48:39 CEST 2016
On Saturday, October 22, 2016, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote: > Hi Arash, > > > If old businesses depend on selling IPv4 address to new comers and now > > looking to put some more value on their old blocks, their strategy should > > not be supported by 2016-03. > > I'm sorry, but it's doing the opposite: it will make sure that the > remaining pool is not drained by traders, keeping it available for longer > for new companies that need them. If the "cheap" pool for newcomers runs > out and address transfers become the *only* source for addresses, guess > what will happen to the prices. I've heared this story over and over. Let's protect the pool, let's not waste it and now, after 4 years the pool is almost the same size. Again, what is our purpose here ? Where is the imagined abuse ? Bring up some actual statistics not fake scary scenarios. Ciprian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20161023/fb412be2/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]