[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Sun Oct 23 02:27:35 CEST 2016
Hi Arash, > I understand your point, but this already happened with other RIRs and they > have no "cheap" pool to fulfil new requests, what happened them and to the > prices in their region? Do we have many intra-RIR transfers from RIPE region > to other RIRs today? Good question. I'm sure the NCC will include such numbers I their presentation next week. I'm curious about that as well. > Luckily we still have an /8 in RIPE (and thanks to the old community members > for that), but 2016-03 cannot make that much change on draining rate. And I > don't think that the pool is that much drained by traders. Yes there is a > percentage drained by traders, but comparing to the actual users that's not > that much to put this kind of restriction. (We also have enough other > restrictions in place) Thanks for setting a good example of how to discuss policy proposal effects in a civil way. I completely understand your reasoning, and this is useful feedback. Thank you! Sander (After all that has happened on this list recently I felt I had to encourage good discussions as well. I don't want to sound negative all the time :)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]