[address-policy-wg] Comment on IPv4 depletion rate for proposal 2015-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comment on IPv4 depletion rate for proposal 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tom Hill
tom.hill at bytemark.co.uk
Tue May 10 18:40:50 CEST 2016
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 10/05/16 17:17, Jérôme Nicolle wrote: > Did you recently got an inetnum ? Nowadays, the minute you get a > block, you get 10 free e-mails asking to lease a /24 out of it. This is not the same problem that I was referring to? It so happens that what you're referencing is also completely irrelevant to 2015-05, or the IPv4 austerity procedure; you can happily ignore any business offering to lease your IPs, and even if you accepted their offer, the IP space would still not be not allocated to those persons indefinitely. - -- Tom Hill Network Engineer Bytemark Hosting http://www.bytemark.co.uk/ tel. +44 1904 890 890 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXMg8SAAoJEH2fKbrp2sQ6diUH/0oibUrH0EyCaoAm2AXz/GkU XWI627oXQbDuOk6IdxHLgzAELuRpQoNS9AjebGFpJZ3nnv+iuxXuuHF8i/Jnt5pr pjP9Q63bgEHuBX689kAXEwP6KgnMw4rnh3ivCHTOj63JHTJ1YFPGj2ZxPo1FNQMQ d1rdicWUpaWsdm4xKeALjuUEPFK1kZrZb+hjRCgjrjGnr84htzufOn0gOS//Mswm EuFi3kAmqqaoYQcOzIsmIod+YOUhah1+arsSFsdh1LM8b1cyuh/o8CTpg+gURAyh VkAlcBpOUOEJR+ePEE+2LuxWqgWOtMgoHwa+UW2whOtjTcdC84lF3XXRwqHG6oo= =keoH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comment on IPv4 depletion rate for proposal 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]