[address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments

Hi,

Excuse the briefness of this mail, it was sent from a mobile device.

> On Jun 23, 2016, at 09:26, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:49:35PM +0300, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote:
>> let's also chip in the possibility to make /64 assignments while
>> redefining the definition. plenty that keep coming at the RIPE Meeting
>> with all kind of cases where they want to use IPv6 (PI) but membership
>> is not accesible.
>>
>> https://ripe72.ripe.net/presentations/114-RIPE72-IPv6-PI.pdf
>
> No, IPv6 PI policy is a different topic and needs to be covered by a
> different proposal.

I only proposed this because in my mind it could have easily been
solved when redefining the end site definition.

/elvis

>
> Gert Doering
>        -- NetMaster
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279