[address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Jun 23 08:26:36 CEST 2016
Hi, On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:49:35PM +0300, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote: > let's also chip in the possibility to make /64 assignments while > redefining the definition. plenty that keep coming at the RIPE Meeting > with all kind of cases where they want to use IPv6 (PI) but membership > is not accesible. > > https://ripe72.ripe.net/presentations/114-RIPE72-IPv6-PI.pdf No, IPv6 PI policy is a different topic and needs to be covered by a different proposal. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160623/05b04c67/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ipv6 assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]