[address-policy-wg] Support for 2016-03 v2.0

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Daniel Suchy <danny at danysek.cz> wrote:

> Hello,
>

Hello,


>
> Do we really want do block new organisations with new allocations, but
> allow old (happy) one to do anything with addresses tehy have...? That's
> not fair.
>

I'm afraid that "fair" in that regard, is impossible to achieve.


> There're organisations, which have large allocations and they're
> sometimes not taking care - they have enough IPv4 addresses, nothing is
> pushing them to implement IPv6, or save address space by implementation
> of some NAT solution. If they decide to sell their business, policy will
> allow that - but, if "new" resource holder will try similar thing,
> policy will ban then?
>

No, the new policy does not ban selling their business (merger/acquisition).

My point is simple - there should be ONLY ONE POLICY - independent on
> time of allocation. Such policy must limit not only new LIRs (using
> addresses from last /8), but also old LIRs holding addresses from old
> allocations.
>

Why do you want to do that?


>
> And if we really want to reclaim some address space, we should review
> current allocations - in terms of current situation in IPv4 world.
>
>
How do you propose to go about that?

-- 
Jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160619/74e839cb/attachment.html>