[address-policy-wg] Support for 2016-03 v2.0

Sat Jun 18 23:41:34 CEST 2016

+1

On 19.06.2016 0:38, Daniel Suchy wrote:
> Do we really want do block new organisations with new allocations, but
> allow old (happy) one to do anything with addresses tehy have...? That's
> not fair.

+1

>There're organisations, which have large allocations and they're
>sometimes not taking care - they have enough IPv4 addresses, nothing is
>pushing them to implement IPv6, or save address space by implementation
>of some NAT solution. If they decide to sell their business, policy will
>allow that - but, if "new" resource holder will try similar thing,
>policy will ban then?

Yuri at NTX