[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Sat Jun 11 14:01:40 CEST 2016
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016, at 17:19, Aled Morris wrote: > I'm curious to know what benefit such customers perceive from being LIRs > (rather than just taking IP address space from you). Hi, They have "their own" space, one /22 for them alone. Not sure this is something easy (even less cost-effective) enough to obtain these days. > From what you say they don't run their own networks - do they assign > resources to their downstream customers? Don't know about Dominik's customers, but some of them do. You can find several kinds of network-less service providers out there in the wild. Then there's the issue of things done "inside out" : ISPs running on ASSIGNED PI (not very willing to deal with RIPE / RIPE NCC) and end-users on ALLOCATED PA (willing to do so).
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]