[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christian Kratzer
ck-lists at cksoft.de
Fri Jun 10 17:27:52 CEST 2016
Hi, On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Aled Morris wrote: > On Friday, 10 June 2016, Dominik Nowacki <dominik at clouvider.co.uk> wrote: > >> Aled, >> The data you provided is not relevant. >> >> For example, we have a significant number of Customers who have a number >> of servers with us, are LIRs themselves, but we do BGP for them, as such >> there is a significant number of /22s originated from our AS, yet not >> owned, nor operated by us. >> > > I'm curious to know what benefit such customers perceive from being LIRs > (rather than just taking IP address space from you). From what you say they > don't run their own networks - do they assign resources to their downstream > customers? Not from the 185/8 allocation obviously. simple reasons: - get more space than your upstream is willing to give to you - you want but cannot get pi space so getting your own pa space is a good substitute Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: ck at cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2 Phone: +49 7032 893 997 - 0 D-71126 Gaeufelden Fax: +49 7032 893 997 - 9 HRB 245288, Amtsgericht Stuttgart Mobile: +49 171 1947 843 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Kratzer Web: http://www.cksoft.de/
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]