[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aleksey Bulgakov
aleksbulgakov at gmail.com
Tue Jun 7 00:30:44 CEST 2016
I was disagree with Elvis about 2015-01, but I agree now. Dear, chairs. Could you, please, tell if this proposal is opened for discuss or withdrawn. :) 7 июня 2016 г. 1:23 пользователь "Elvis Daniel Velea" <elvis at v4escrow.net> написал: > Hi, > On 6/7/16 1:17 AM, Jim Reid wrote: > > On 6 Jun 2016, at 22:54, Aleksey Bulgakov <aleksbulgakov at gmail.com> <aleksbulgakov at gmail.com> wrote: > > Why are we talking about 185./8 only? > > > We are not. You might be though. :-) > > Why are we still talking about this proposal? I was under the impression > that it will be withdrawn soon after the RIPE Meeting. > > If that is the case, let's withdraw it and stop the noise :) If not, > Remco, please let us know what you want to do with it as it is obvious that > this version will never be accepted. > > thanks, > elvis > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160607/8072f01a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]