[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elvis Daniel Velea
elvis at v4escrow.net
Tue Jun 7 00:22:52 CEST 2016
Hi, On 6/7/16 1:17 AM, Jim Reid wrote: >> On 6 Jun 2016, at 22:54, Aleksey Bulgakov <aleksbulgakov at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Why are we talking about 185./8 only? > We are not. You might be though. :-) Why are we still talking about this proposal? I was under the impression that it will be withdrawn soon after the RIPE Meeting. If that is the case, let's withdraw it and stop the noise :) If not, Remco, please let us know what you want to do with it as it is obvious that this version will never be accepted. thanks, elvis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160607/00d8b63e/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]