[address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discussion phase .. 2015-04 New Policy Proposal (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Mon Sep 14 16:39:14 CEST 2015
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 03:49:24PM +0200, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote: >On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 15:09, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > >If you have some ideas of how to reliably determine "real ipv6 >deployment" *AND* write down that criteria in a policy-friendly way, >you're welcome (want to be part of the proposal ? - ok). I know that it's not likely we could come up with something that is 100% reliable. I was thinking along the lines of a statement in the allocation request like: "We have deployed IPv6 to our customers and we are using $technology to do it." combined with a mini-audit focusing on ipv6 assignments. I know this could be gamed but it may serve as a gentle nudge in the direction of at least making *some* effort towards ipv6 deployment. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discussion phase .. 2015-04 New Policy Proposal (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]