[address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Mon Sep 14 15:49:24 CEST 2015
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 15:09, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > 1) anything that increases the bureaucracy required to deal with > the NCC for a first allocation is a non-goer. > > 2) I could live with giving a LIR which has only received an > "austerity /22" another shot after a certain time, but I'd couple > it with some proof of ipv6 deployment (beyond just advertising a > /32) If you have some ideas of how to reliably determine "real ipv6 deployment" *AND* write down that criteria in a policy-friendly way, you're welcome (want to be part of the proposal ? - ok). -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]