[address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Mon Sep 14 10:41:44 CEST 2015
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 10:03, Tore Anderson wrote: > > b. treat all addressing space available for allocation as a single pool > B. KISS. > > > 2. Conditions for allocation the first /22. > Maintain the status quo. Point taken. > > 3. Further allocation(s) (after the first /22) > None of the above. My preference is to maintain the status quo - no > additional allocations. I do not quite see why we should change the > «last /8» policy which in my view has been quite successful (except for > the abuse that 2015-01 hopefully helps shut down). > > If it ain't broke, don't fix it? > > Unless we interpret «broke» to mean «exhausted». If so, c'est la vie. I take "broken" as "painful and far enough from exhaustion", so in need of a fix. Reminder, we are 3 years (precisely) into the "last /8 IPocalypse", and RIPE still has more than 0.98 of a /8 available (more likely 0.99).
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]