[address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at fud.no
Mon Sep 14 10:03:16 CEST 2015
* "Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN" <ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net> > 1. Separate pools or single pool > a. have a "last /8 pool" which is 185.0.0.0/8 (strictly one /22 per > LIR) and a "recovered space pool" containing all space received from > IANA as "recovered and redistributed space" (for extra allocations) - > APNIC-like separation of pools > b. treat all addressing space available for allocation as a single > pool B. KISS. > 2. Conditions for allocation the first /22. > - none (keep the situation as it is today - our preferred option) > - something else (please detail) Maintain the status quo. > 3. Further allocation(s) (after the first /22) > 3.1 introduce some minimum delay after the last allocation : 12 months > (Elvis' favourite) ? 18 Months ? 24 Months (my favourite) ? More ? Less > ? None ? > 3.1.1 Does that mean one can get a new allocation every X months > (LACNIC-style) while the stock lasts ? > 3.2 Allocation size : /22 ? /23 ? variable depending on how much is > available at the time of allocation, max /22, min /24 (which does imply > a little more policy text in order to detail this) ? > 3.3 Additional conditions > 3.3.1 "LIR did not perform an outbound transfer" (do you think it > would make sense to have this condition for the first allocation too) > ? > 3.3.2 Other conditions ??? None of the above. My preference is to maintain the status quo - no additional allocations. I do not quite see why we should change the «last /8» policy which in my view has been quite successful (except for the abuse that 2015-01 hopefully helps shut down). If it ain't broke, don't fix it? Unless we interpret «broke» to mean «exhausted». If so, c'est la vie. Tore
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]