[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Tue Oct 20 17:17:12 CEST 2015
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 16:01, h.lu at anytimechinese.com wrote: > Based on current v6 deploy rate, my guess is in 5 years an new start up > LIR would still appreciate a free /22 available for them. My crystal ball ( https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QN-VW2U2rLiXn7uFvGt249mChXJ9Cjnq1PsyD4ALqtc/edit?usp=sharing ) has some doubts about it. ... and I can see that LIRs open (in oder to use IPv4 space for service not transfer) during the last 3 years have second thoughts after the inital joy of "we got a /22". -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]