[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Tue Oct 20 16:29:16 CEST 2015
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 16:18, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote: > But there is conflict with 2015-01, was accepted to prevent depletion > of the free IPv4 pool, wasn't it? > 2015-01 was published and adopted in order to prevent abuse... as is the "no outbound transfers" criteria for further allocations. > This case we have to create 2015-10 to cancel 2015-01, or change the > text of this one. Where do you see an incompatibility between the two ? -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]