[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

Hello,

Noone (in the RIPE/NCC service region) is able to get more than a /22, 
according to current policies, or did i miss something?

If someone is asking (and actually getting) more than a /22, those 
allocations need to be revoked -- i honestly thought current policy 
already included that...


Regards,
Carlos


On Sat, 25 Apr 2015, Petr Umelov wrote:

> Hi everybody.
>
> Let me tell some words about current proposal.
>
> Many providers (among them is our company) need to get (e.g.) /20 subnet (not 4 x /22). If we ask the RIPE NCC to allocate 4 x /22, we can get next variants:
> 1. /20
> 2. 2 x /21 from different subnets
> 3. /22, /21, /22
>
> There is only one chance to get /20 100% - make request for 7 x /22 (if the tickets will be processed together). But in this case we will have unwanted 3 x /22 which we can transfer to other LIRs to minimize our expenses.
> And also we can get different separate 4 x /22 (the worst case) and we have to transfer such blocks and make new request.
>
> If this proposal will be agreed, many providers (new and old) will have material losses. So I can't support this proposal.
>
> -- 
> Kind regards,
> Techincal Director FastTelecom
> Petr Umelov
>