[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

Hi everybody.

Let me tell some words about current proposal.

Many providers (among them is our company) need to get (e.g.) /20 subnet (not 4 x /22). If we ask the RIPE NCC to allocate 4 x /22, we can get next variants:
1. /20
2. 2 x /21 from different subnets
3. /22, /21, /22

There is only one chance to get /20 100% - make request for 7 x /22 (if the tickets will be processed together). But in this case we will have unwanted 3 x /22 which we can transfer to other LIRs to minimize our expenses.
And also we can get different separate 4 x /22 (the worst case) and we have to transfer such blocks and make new request.

If this proposal will be agreed, many providers (new and old) will have material losses. So I can't support this proposal.

-- 
Kind regards,
Techincal Director FastTelecom
Petr Umelov