[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Thu Apr 23 14:36:38 CEST 2015
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Vladimir Andreev wrote: >> openig a bunch of LIR only for transfering their /22 V4 to another LIR >> is - and always was - abusing the policy. > > Any links to documents proving it? Read the mailing list discussions about the last /8 policy. The /22 per LIR was always about having new entrants to the market being able to at least get a little chunk of addresses so they could have NAT444, email servers etc. It was NEVER meant for people to start LIR, get /22, transfer /22, close LIR, start another LIR, get another /22, transer /22, close LIR, repeat again and again. If the community wanted it to work that way, the policy would have been very differently worded. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]