[address-policy-wg] [Merging ipv6 and address policy mailing lists]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 10
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Merging ipv6 and address policy mailing lists]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aleksi Suhonen
ripe-ml-2012 at ssd.axu.tm
Wed Nov 12 08:32:02 CET 2014
Hello, On 11/09/2014 06:06 PM, Lu wrote: > Should we put address policy wh together with IPv6 wg? Why we need > two different wg for addressing?the day we start treat IPv6 as normal > IP address is the day we really in a world of v6. In theory, the IPv6 working group and mailing lists are not only about address policy. In practice, I do think that a separate mailing list for IPv6 at RIPE has outlived its usefulness. In essence, I support this proposal. -- +358 44 9756548 / http://www.trex.fi/ Aleksi Suhonen / TREX Regional Exchanges Oy You say "potato", I say "closest-exit."
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 10
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Merging ipv6 and address policy mailing lists]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]