[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 10
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 10
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Merging ipv6 and address policy mailing lists]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Sun Nov 9 18:35:47 CET 2014
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 04:06:34PM +0000, Lu wrote: >Should we put address policy wh together with IPv6 wg? Why we >need two different wg for addressing?the day we start treat IPv6 >as normal IP address is the day we really in a world of v6. It's a fair point, actually. IPv6 should no longer be treated as "special". Also, while there are "language-hygiene" efforts underway, should "address-policy" not be renamed to "resource-policy"? It would make clearer that it is no longer about just IP addresses (if it ever was). rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 10
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Merging ipv6 and address policy mailing lists]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]