[address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Janos Zsako
zsako at iszt.hu
Fri Mar 28 19:58:44 CET 2014
Dear Sacha, > What I'm trying to tell you here is that abolition of any min-alloc size > will again require demonstration of "need" in order to get a useful (ie. > routeable) allocation (with all that this entails). Another good question is whether under final-/8 rules, if you can only > justify, say a /29, this will be the last request considered? I think there is a misunderstanding here. This policy (2014-01) does not change the rest of the text of 5.1. It still says: 1. The size of the allocation made will be exactly one /22. Best regards, Janos > rgds, > Sascha Luck > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]