[address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Fri Mar 28 19:23:58 CET 2014
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 06:13:19PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: >You won't, just request IPv6. For IPv4, it will be slightly hard, for >the foreseeable future, to achieve that. > >IOW, I have no idea what you are trying to tell us here...? What I'm trying to tell you here is that abolition of any min-alloc size will again require demonstration of "need" in order to get a useful (ie. routeable) allocation (with all that this entails). Another good question is whether under final-/8 rules, if you can only justify, say a /29, this will be the last request considered? rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]