[address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at instituut.net
Tue Mar 25 09:56:28 CET 2014
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:27:54AM +0200, Elvis Velea wrote: > Hi Erik, > > I, personally, would put the /24 limit in policy. Anything lower than a /24 > can no longer be split by the RIPE NCC and must be transferred in one block. That seems like an arbitrairy limit. What is so magic about /24? I can think of a few use-cases where globally unique ip space (and proper registration in a database) are useful, but global routability is not expected. Kind regards, Job
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]