[address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elvis Velea
elvis at velea.eu
Tue Mar 25 09:27:54 CET 2014
Hi Erik, I, personally, would put the /24 limit in policy. Anything lower than a /24 can no longer be split by the RIPE NCC and must be transferred in one block. cheers, elvis On 24/03/14 23:44, Erik Bais wrote: > > Hi, > > As you might know, we are currently working on a policy proposal to > allow the transfer of PI space. > > One of the topics that I would like some input (prior to sending out > the proposal itself) it the following: > > In the current draft, I've phrased one of the 'rules' for the PI > transfer as follows: > > -Assignments smaller than the minimal allocation size, can't be split > into smaller assignments, but can be re-assigned as a complete > assignment. > > My reasoning is that it would disallow cutting up small assignments > into even smaller assignments. > > So in the current situation a /23 PI assignment is smaller than the > minimal allocation size, however assigned in the past by the RIPE NCC. > > With the above stated 'rule' in the proposal, it would not be allowed > to split up a PI assignment into 2 PI assignments of a /24 .. or 4 PI > assignments of a /25, but it would be allowed to do a complete > re-assignments as a /23. > > With the current new proposal 2014-1 put forward today, the question > that we discussed last week (myself, Marco and Andrea ) is that if we > would put this forward, that this might need to be re-phrased. > > The question that I have is, would the community prefer a transfer > policy proposal for PI with or without the above stated rule or > limitation in freedom in transfers of PI. > > The goal of the PI transfer policy proposal is to have it similar as > the current Transfer policy for PA space. > > Let's hear it. > > > Regards > > Erik Bais > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140325/13346825/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]