[address-policy-wg] Fwd: Re: 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)

Hi,

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:25:39PM -0500, David Farmer wrote:
> Again you are obfuscating and trivializing his objection.  The RIPE NCC 
> doesn't just "giving public resources away", the primary cost is the 
> justification of those resources.  Or, the cost of dealing with the 
> "bureaucracy" that you want to eliminate, that is not free, which is why 
> you want to eliminate it.
> 
> Please stop obfuscating and trivializing people's objections, you either 
> have sufficient support to ignore their objections or you should address 
> them properly.

Tore is actually responding to your and Sylvain's concerns to *address*
them (or to explain why he's convinced that 2013-03 does not affect the
concern voiced), not to obfuscate/trivialize them, and the WG chairs 
appreciate that.

Whether or not we as WG chairs can "ignore the objection" depends somewhat
on the total balance of support (preferably from the people affected by
this, which really is "RIPE LIRs day to day business"), repetitive, and
new objections.  We'll see.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130920/330799d9/attachment.sig>