[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:26:31PM +0100, Malcolm Hutty wrote:
> I don't support the approval of 2013-03 "No need" at this time.

While you're free to do so, I'm just so slightly annoyed that you're
doing this *again* - wait until the very last second, and then state
fundamental objections.

Generally speaking, this sort of blunt "the fundamental principle is 
wrong" statement of opposition at the very end of the review phase is 
wasting lots of effort that has gone into making the policy text, creating
the impact analysis (lots of time spent at the NCC), and in the preceding
discussions.

Fundamental opposition really should be voiced in the intitial phase
of a proposal, where we try to find common ground to then build the
specific text that is then evaluated for the impact analysis.

(Technically speaking, your opposition was actually voiced *after the 
end* of the review phase - which was on July 30.  But since we intended 
to extend the review phase anyway, based on the ongoing discussion, this 
point is somewhat moot)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130801/30e9827e/attachment.sig>