[address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Tue Sep 11 12:05:22 CEST 2012
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:52:10AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: >* Joins the NCC - becomes a LIR >* Makes 1 initial allocation request - gets a /22 >* Makes 1 PA assignment request (to itself) > >Cost: ?1750 > >Or: > >* Makes 1 PI assignment request [through a sponsoring LIR] > >Cost: ?50 But they can do this now. In fact it's always been possible to game that system, regardless of ipv4 run-out. Assuming this is not a widespread problem now, why would it become one? rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]