[address-policy-wg] [eix-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [eix-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Thu Mar 29 15:52:43 CEST 2012
On 3/29/12 3:08 PM, Sascha Luck wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 02:36:16PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: >> Those were all in the initial discussion phase. I don't need a full >> repetition of all these, but a few statements of position in the review >> phase *are* helpful, to see whether people are still agreeing, even if >> the >> text has changed somewhat between v1.0 and v3.0 :-) > > I'm ok with the proposal. > > Even "new" IXPs will be connecting existing SPs that already have IPv4 > legacy space. Other new organisations will have to build ipv6-only > networks eventually anyway. Withholding a /16 from those is not going to > have a noticeable impact on the Internet. +1 Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [eix-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]