This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] [eix-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [eix-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [eix-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Thu Mar 29 15:08:42 CEST 2012
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 02:36:16PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: >Those were all in the initial discussion phase. I don't need a full >repetition of all these, but a few statements of position in the review >phase *are* helpful, to see whether people are still agreeing, even if the >text has changed somewhat between v1.0 and v3.0 :-) I'm ok with the proposal. Even "new" IXPs will be connecting existing SPs that already have IPv4 legacy space. Other new organisations will have to build ipv6-only networks eventually anyway. Withholding a /16 from those is not going to have a noticeable impact on the Internet. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [eix-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [eix-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]