[address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Tue Nov 8 23:24:26 CET 2011
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 04:32:18PM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote: >I tell you, widespread PI adoption is poison for the network. >Just saying. So that I can tell you "told you so!" > >Regards, > >- Havard, in a pessmistic mood For a pessimistic outlook on what will be poison for the network, try: http://ripe63.ripe.net/presentations/205-2011-10-31-exhaustion.pdf on the alternatives to widespread, rapid IPv6 deployment. Successful transition to IPv6 is by no means a sure thing. The only advantage IPv6 has going for it right now is that it offers virtually unlimited, easily available address space. If we keep creating artificial scarcity by way of arbitrary rules and restrictions, IPv6 deployment *will not happen*. For the consequences, refer to the above. Regards, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]