[address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Tue Nov 8 20:28:38 CET 2011
On Nov 8, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Erik Bais wrote: >>>> I tell you, widespread PI adoption is poison for the network. >>> Maybe, maybe not. >> No, really, it is. > And sorry to burst your bubble, but you are wrong and the information (read > as: the facts and not as gut feelings) from the other RIR's show (from those > that have a similar policy in place) that the number of v6 PI prefixes is > not taking the steep jump. :-) 'An optimist is someone who jumps off a tall building and after 50 floors says, "So far, so good."' Regards, -drc
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]