[address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC address request retracted
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC address request retracted
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC address request retracted
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Tue Dec 6 17:27:06 CET 2011
On 06/12/11 14:17, Kurt Kayser wrote: > > True, ideally I would also like to see a comparison of effort of new address space to be used vs. legacy space analyzed and reorganized in order to save new request. (unit to measured in man-hours and amount of address space under discussion). > Idea is to motivate people to start considering reorg vs. new blocks + requests for distribution. I also understand that above a certain size, this never would make sense. > On the other hand I'd rather not see any more wasted time go down this rat-hole. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC address request retracted
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC address request retracted
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]