[address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC address request retracted
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC address request retracted
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC address request retracted
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Kayser
kurt_kayser at gmx.de
Tue Dec 6 15:17:41 CET 2011
Hi Axel, > >> ok, i'll bite. what is the ncc doing instead? or is the need > >> no longer perceived? > > > > need continues. Have instructed staff to find fitting address space in > > the current holdings, and if needed, restructure / renumber. > > appreciate the answer. True, ideally I would also like to see a comparison of effort of new address space to be used vs. legacy space analyzed and reorganized in order to save new request. (unit to measured in man-hours and amount of address space under discussion). Idea is to motivate people to start considering reorg vs. new blocks + requests for distribution. I also understand that above a certain size, this never would make sense. Regards, Kurt -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC address request retracted
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC address request retracted
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]