[address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:28, boggits <boggits at gmail.com> wrote:

> Why should a company require PIv6 addressing when the task of
> renumbering within IPv6 space has become so simple?

Why should a company need to renumber using a simple process when
there are easier paths?

While this policy change will most likely increase the number of
global routes, I personally don't think this should become too much of
a problem provided the prices keep the same or even increase.

As Michiel Klaver pointed out, special, lower, pricing for NFPs might
make sense, but this is way outside the scope of this proposal.


Long story short, I am in favour of this change.



Richard