[address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)

On 15 April 2011 10:22, Emilio Madaio <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote:
> A proposed change to the RIPE Document ripe-512,"IPv6 Address
> Allocation and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion.

> You can find the full proposal at:
>
>    http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-02

Why should a company require PIv6 addressing when the task of
renumbering within IPv6 space has become so simple?

I'd rather that the size of blocks provided to end users were
standardised to reduce the number of possible changes that might be
needed, but otherwise this seems to be a request for a change that has
no benefit to the operation of the network (even though I can see
valid commercial reasons for wanting to do it)

We made this mistake with PIv4 please can we not do it again with v6

All that means I'm not in favour of this change.

J
-- 

James Blessing
07989 039 476