[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Wed Apr 14 11:53:41 CEST 2010
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 10:27 +0100, Carlos Friacas wrote: > > 6. We adopt a slightly modified form of the proposal, which would allow > > RIPE to return address space to IANA with a proviso that this address space > > was returned on the basis that it may only be re-assigned to other RIRs who > > have adopted mandatory address space return. > > I tend to like this one... however, AFRINIC, LACNIC and APNIC would > probably need to ammend their already aproved policy on this subject > too... Yes, adoption of a modified form of the proposal just bangs another nail into the coffin. Can I reiterate? This proposal is dead. I'm just trying to make the funeral arrangements and give it a decent burial before people start to wrinkle their noses and remark how stuffy it's getting. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]