[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friacas
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Wed Apr 14 11:27:19 CEST 2010
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 13/04/2010 14:31, Nigel Titley wrote: >> 1. We adopt it in its original form thus demonstrating solidarity with >> the other regions, apart from Arin. >> >> 2. We adopt the Arin form of the proposal, thus demonstrating solidarity >> with Arin, but with no one else >> >> 3. We reject the proposal outright, thus demonstrating that we can't >> make up our minds or that we think it will never work, or something... >> >> 4. We ask the regional authors (in this case myself and Axel) to >> withdraw the proposal in this region. > > There are two other options. > > 5. We adopt the proposal but make its commencement dependent on all other > RIRs adopting it. > > or: > > 6. We adopt a slightly modified form of the proposal, which would allow > RIPE to return address space to IANA with a proviso that this address space > was returned on the basis that it may only be re-assigned to other RIRs who > have adopted mandatory address space return. I tend to like this one... however, AFRINIC, LACNIC and APNIC would probably need to ammend their already aproved policy on this subject too... Regards, Carlos > Nick >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]