[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Wed Sep 16 22:43:42 CEST 2009
>> Because this is just for initial allocations, I think 2 to 4 years is >> a reasonable timeframe. IPv4 will run out. This is only meant to make >> sure that new entrants have a few IPv4 addresses to work with. > What are the consequences to running out significantly earlier than > 2-4 years? How important is the continued availability of small blocks > when the bulk of the IPv4 address space ahs already been allocated? trick question assuming v6 transition, how long will it take? until then, everyone will need a teensie bit of v4 to stay connected to the (declining) v4 internet. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]