[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Wed Sep 16 17:49:08 CEST 2009
Hi, On 14/09/2009 12:50, "Sander Steffann" <sander at steffann.nl> wrote: [...] >> I don't know how many years people want small blocks of IPv4 address >> space >> to be available for under a policy along these lines but I think if >> it is >> more than just one or two it probably needs to be designed in a way >> that >> takes account of historic demand and how people will react when other >> avenues are cut off. > > Because this is just for initial allocations, I think 2 to 4 years is > a reasonable timeframe. IPv4 will run out. This is only meant to make > sure that new entrants have a few IPv4 addresses to work with. What are the consequences to running out significantly earlier than 2-4 years? How important is the continued availability of small blocks when the bulk of the IPv4 address space ahs already been allocated? Regards, Leo Vegoda
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]