[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Scholten
mark at streamservice.nl
Tue Sep 15 17:18:26 CEST 2009
Hello Sander, I think that in that case PI should be removed. Because else it could have a big legal impact I think. Processing requests from 2 companies different by an organization that has a monopoly isn't a very smart way to work (and the risk for legal issues is very big). With kind regards, Mark Scholten -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Sander Steffann Sent: dinsdag 15 september 2009 11:59 To: Mark Scholten Cc: 'Leo Vegoda'; 'Michiel Klaver'; address-policy-wg at ripe.net Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2 Hi Mark, > Would it be an option to have something written in the policy that means > the following? > The reserved /10 (or other range) from the last /8 RIPE NCC receives from > IANA is to be used for PA allocations. Whenever there are no other > addresses available to use for PI allocations the /10 (or part of > that)(that effective are the last IPv4 addresses RIPE NCC can provide to > the RIPE community at that time) can also be used for other allocations, > like PI. The problem with that is that the /10 would be used up in a *very* short time. I think we can get away (legally speaking) with not reserving any address space for separate organisations (PI), but I don't think we can get away with 'blocking the market' for new providers / LIRs (PA). Which is why I proposed to reserve space for PA initial allocations :) I could be wrong here ofcourse... Thanks, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]