[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Tue Sep 15 11:58:54 CEST 2009
Hi Mark, > Would it be an option to have something written in the policy that means > the following? > The reserved /10 (or other range) from the last /8 RIPE NCC receives from > IANA is to be used for PA allocations. Whenever there are no other > addresses available to use for PI allocations the /10 (or part of > that)(that effective are the last IPv4 addresses RIPE NCC can provide to > the RIPE community at that time) can also be used for other allocations, > like PI. The problem with that is that the /10 would be used up in a *very* short time. I think we can get away (legally speaking) with not reserving any address space for separate organisations (PI), but I don't think we can get away with 'blocking the market' for new providers / LIRs (PA). Which is why I proposed to reserve space for PA initial allocations :) I could be wrong here ofcourse... Thanks, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]