[address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed May 27 21:53:29 CEST 2009
Hello Frederic, > so we do not support this 2009-06. because this confirm to let > choice for operator so it let choice to not garant routing. Routing a block of address space *IS* the choice of the operator, and nobody can guarantee that a block of addresses is routed everywhere. RIPE policies will always leave this choice to the operators. It is even in the RIPE Terms of Reference: "IP networks collaborating in RIPE remain under the executive authority of their respective organisations". RIPE does give guidelines for network operators. A good example is http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-469.html#3 . - Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]