[address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Wed May 27 18:53:57 CEST 2009
On 27/05/2009 9:41, "Frederic" <frederic at placenet.org> wrote: > Le mercredi 27 mai 2009 à 18:36 +0200, Jeroen Massar a écrit : >> Frederic wrote: >>> we do not support this proposal and we would garant routing for min >>> ipv6-PI block assignement. >> >> RIPE NCC cannot guarantee anything regarding routing. > > yes we know. > > but we suggest that may be a good rule to write somewhere that it's ask > to LIR to garant routing. There is a separate informational document describing the address space managed by the RIPE NCC. It identifies the minimum size allocations and assignments they make in each block they manage: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-469.html It includes a statement on routing decisions in section 3. Regards, Leo Vegoda
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]