[address-policy-wg] RE: Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Fri Jul 17 15:27:25 CEST 2009
Sascha Lenz wrote: [...] > I would support a more "floating" (first) allocation policy, because > even that i think that we don't need to conserve IPv4 space too much, i > also don't think that we need to waste it either if there are other > simple options like what you suggest (smaller Allocation on request or so). While it may be an intersting idea in light of conservation, there's a good operational reason why all the LIR Allocations are of equal (minimum) size: filtering on prefix length. :-) Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]