[address-policy-wg] RE: Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space

Hi,

Remco van Mook schrieb:
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> It is heartening to see that your drive to conservation of IPv4 space 
> alone is pushing you to put all this effort in to get PI space. I’m sure 
> we can suggest a policy change approved that would set the standard 
> initial allocation to /21 but allow for smaller allocations up to /24 if 
> specifically requested by the new LIR.

[...]

... apart from the fact that i don't think the whole community agrees 
that we need any form of IPv4 conservation anyways :-) ... i think this 
would be the apropriate step here, yes.

I would support a more "floating" (first) allocation policy, because 
even that i think that we don't need to conserve IPv4 space too much, i 
also don't think that we need to waste it either if there are other 
simple options like what you suggest (smaller Allocation on request or so).


-- 
========================================================================
= Sascha Lenz                  SLZ-RIPE          slz at baycix.de         =
= Network Design & Operations                                          =
= BayCIX GmbH, Landshut                  * PGP public Key on demand *  =
========================================================================