[address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue Apr 7 14:48:32 CEST 2009
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Max Tulyev wrote: > Seriously, in that time hardware will become capable of carrying that > easy. What timeframe is that? 10 years ago, the state of the art core routing platforms were capable of a few hundreds of thousands of FIB routes, today it seems to be 1-2M for the more expensive platforms. If you're talking about 2020 then by then 3-4M might be working well, but you'd still spend a lot more than than needed in converging a network with that many prefixes. For the good of the Internet, let's not put more prefixes in DFZ than needed. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]