[address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Tue Apr 7 14:38:16 CEST 2009
Marcus Stoegbauer wrote: > But to be serious for a minute: if all those /27 would be announced a > IPv4 full table would nearly triple in size (or in other words: all > those /27 are twice the size of a full IPv4 table today). This can't > possibly end well, so I'm not in favor for this proposal in its current > form. When the price for IPv4 will be much higher, we will see even a lot of /32 in the table ;) Seriously, in that time hardware will become capable of carrying that easy. -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]